Standard of Proof in Misconduct


MY Labour Law Thoughts

Heard of the term ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ before? The simple meaning to this is in a criminal case, the prosecutor has to establish his case beyond a single doubt otherwise the accused will not be punished. It goes to show that because one’s livelihood is at stake in criminal cases, until and unless the prosecutor successfully proves his case without a doubt, the accused will be innocent. 

I mentioned the word ‘criminal’ above. For employment matters, we are not using the same standards used in a criminal case. The standard of proof for employment related matters is based on a balance of probabilities. For example, at a domestic inquiry, the prosecutor only needs to prove that it is ‘more probable’ that the accused employee had committed such act(s) of misconduct. 

There is always a danger when HR gets internal panel members and fail to train them on the difference between…

View original post 74 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s